[time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan
Magnus Danielson
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Mon Jul 9 22:15:16 UTC 2012
On 07/09/2012 03:32 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
> HI
>
> My assumption is that for what we would be doing, one lock is all it's going to take. The local clock will be good enough to allow you to never need to re-aquire. You will indeed steer to maintain phase, but you already have and know what's coming in on the modulation.
Except for leap second announcements.
Another thing is to monitor for cycle-slips.
Cheers,
Magnus
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list