[time-nuts] FCC Chair Talks Spectrum, Gets GPS Letter

Michael Blazer mblazer at satx.rr.com
Sat Mar 10 04:18:31 UTC 2012


I'm sure it's way, way better.  Just ask them, they'll tell you...  Even 
if you could buy it of the shelf, how well would it perform in anything 
but the reference design?  Their envelopes look very, very good. In my 
experience, the entire front end would need to be very carefully tuned.

On 3/9/2012 8:11 PM, David wrote:
> I see a big lack of details.  Form factor?  Insertion loss?  Frequency
> change with temperature?  How does it compare with a standard Murata
> filters?
>
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:32:10 -0600, Michael Blazer
> <mblazer at satx.rr.com>  wrote:
>
>> Here's the link to the white paper:
>> http://javad.com/downloads/javadgnss/publications/20112312.pdf.  It was
>> originally linked from GPS World's news email.  It was originally posted
>> as a technical white paper.  I don't recall the 'Political Noise' lead
>> in, but then, I'm a technical person and try to avoid political noise
>> anyway.  After rereading it, it seems more like a 'I love me' piece.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 3/8/2012 12:53 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
>>> mblazer at satx.rr.com said:
>>>> I read a white paper Javad put out touting their new (and cheaper to  build)
>>>> front end filter.  Of course it is patented.  So guess where  everyone has
>>>> to go should LS get the green light.
>>> Was that filter included as part of the recent round of testing?  Did it work?
>>>
>>> I don't remember seeing any grand press releases along the lines of "just use
>>> our filter".
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>



More information about the time-nuts mailing list