[time-nuts] Possible replacement for FE5680A
lists at rtty.us
Sun Mar 11 00:08:12 UTC 2012
Measuring it will be a lot cheaper than building a pair of them to feed the comparison...
On Mar 10, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Azelio Boriani <azelio.boriani at screen.it> wrote:
> Amazing, 10 at -19... will it ever be measurable?
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch> wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:29:39 +0800
>> Roger Costello <roger at costello.com.au> wrote:
>>> I noticed this which could potentially be a very good thing.
>> The paper they refere to can be found at  (and other related stuff
>> can be found on their homepage ). Unfortunately, my limited knowledge
>> is not enoug to understand what the paper is really about. The only
>> things i could gather is, that they are using a nucleus angular momentum
>> difference, that seems to be indepedent of everything and probe it trough
>> the interatcion with the electronic cloud... But where this differnece
>> comes from and why it is independent of outside fields is beyond me..
>> Can someone with more physics knowlege give a small summary of what
>> they did and what makes it so special?
>> Attila Kinali
>>  http://kuzmichlab.gatech.edu/publications/229ThClock_arXiv.pdf
>>  http://kuzmichlab.gatech.edu/publications.php
>> Why does it take years to find the answers to
>> the questions one should have asked long ago?
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> and follow the instructions there.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts