[time-nuts] WWVB - Response to Question posed to John Lowe

Peter Monta pmonta at gmail.com
Sat Mar 17 03:11:15 UTC 2012


> So I gather from this they are working on something, but no details were
> given.

One possibility for a workaround to keep the classical receivers happy
is to leave some residual carrier.  Instead of a 180-degree phase
shift, make it 90 or 120, so that the signal can be regarded as the
sum of a pure carrier and a smaller BPSK signal.

Would older receivers be OK with this?  They really should be tracking
on timescales much longer than one second anyway, so there's some hope
at least.

Cheers,
Peter



More information about the time-nuts mailing list