[time-nuts] WWVB BPSK Receiver Project? (fwd)
lists at lazygranch.com
lists at lazygranch.com
Sat Mar 17 20:26:55 UTC 2012
Check out "Observations on Ferrite Rod Antennas", QEX, 2008. Type 61 works better at low frequencies regardless of manufacturers guidelines.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Charles P. Steinmetz" <charles_steinmetz at lavabit.com>
Sender: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:01:36
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement<time-nuts at febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<time-nuts at febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] WWVB BPSK Receiver Project? (fwd)
gary wrote:
>OK, assuming type 61, it is 0.1%/deg C.
IME, Type 78 is the usual choice for resonant antennas below 200 kHz
(tempco of initial permeability = 1.0%/deg C). I have seen Type 33
used for broadband LF/MF antennas (tempco of initial permeability =
0.1%/deg C). Type 61 is generally not used below 200 kHz.
Best regards,
Charles
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list