[time-nuts] WWVB BPSK Receiver Project? (fwd)

lists at lazygranch.com lists at lazygranch.com
Sat Mar 17 20:26:55 UTC 2012


Check out "Observations on Ferrite Rod Antennas", QEX, 2008. Type 61 works better at low frequencies regardless of manufacturers guidelines. 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Charles P. Steinmetz" <charles_steinmetz at lavabit.com>
Sender: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:01:36 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement<time-nuts at febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
	<time-nuts at febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] WWVB BPSK Receiver Project? (fwd)

gary wrote:

>OK, assuming type 61, it is 0.1%/deg C.

IME, Type 78 is the usual choice for resonant antennas below 200 kHz 
(tempco of initial permeability = 1.0%/deg C).  I have seen Type 33 
used for broadband LF/MF antennas (tempco of initial permeability = 
0.1%/deg C).  Type 61 is generally not used below 200 kHz.

Best regards,

Charles







_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


More information about the time-nuts mailing list