[time-nuts] Distribution amps and slew rate

Chris Albertson albertson.chris at gmail.com
Sun Nov 4 00:05:08 UTC 2012


The below is correct but a simpler way to say it is this:

"A square wave contains the fundamental frequency plus every odd harmonic
up to infinity.  A sine wave contains only the fundamental frequency."

It is the "up to infinity" part that causes all the trouble.  And yes it
really does go to infinity, at least in theory.  but in real life you can't
have frequencies so high so without them you can't and don't have a perfect
square wave.  In other words perfect square wave can't esist in the real
world but perfect sine wave, at least in theory could


On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Charles P. Steinmetz <
charles_steinmetz at lavabit.com> wrote:

> david wrote:
>
>  Given that slew rate is so critical, why do we distribute sine waves and
>> perform the zero-crossing detection at every target instrument?
>>
>
> Magnus made some good points in response to your question. To elaborate a
> bit: it is much easier to provide a friendly transmission environment for a
> sine wave (single frequency), and sine waves are less sensitive to
> imperfections in the transmission environment (impedance discontinuities
> and mismatches, noise ingress, etc.).  Reflections in the transmission
> environment will put funny steps in what started life as clean square waves
> or pulses, and differential phase shifts will also mis-shape square waves
> or pulses.  This can even be a problem with sine waves -- see, for example,
> the NIST paper on the timing effects of distortion in sine wave sources for
> an example of the sensitivity of sine wave systems to harmonics (Walls and
> Ascarrunz, The Effect of Harmonic Distortion on Phase Errors in Frequency
> Distribution and Synthesis) -- but it is much worse with square waves or
> pulses.
>
> Sine wave systems are also much less prone to radiating noise.  Anyone who
> operates one or more frequency standards as well as sensitive RF receivers
> can testify that sine waves are much less of a hassle.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
> and follow the instructions there.
>



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


More information about the time-nuts mailing list