[time-nuts] Factors other Than Antenna Splitters

Bob Camp lists at rtty.us
Fri Oct 12 16:23:05 UTC 2012


Hi

As others have reported, a TBolt in a good environment is closer to a 1 or 2
ns one sigma (over 100+ seconds) than to the numbers in the Trimble manual. 

The satellite data on the NIST site shows much better numbers than they show
for Satellite Clock and Satellite orbit. 

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of johncroos at aol.com
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 11:02 AM
To: time-nuts at febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Factors other Than Antenna Splitters

Hello All -

The recent discussion on the use / not use of splitters affecting GPS
timing performance may be further informed by this table. It was 
extracted from
page 5-8 of the

"Thunderbolt Disciplined Clock User Guide"
Version 5.0
Part Number: 35326-30
November 2003

Table 5-1 GPS Error Sources

Error Source 1 Standard Deviation 5 - 50 ns
Atmospheric Models (Ionosphere) 5 - 50 ns
Receiver noise (Multipath) 1 - 20 ns
Satellite Clock Model 10 ns
Satellite Orbit Model 5 ns
Antenna Survey 1 ns

Paragraph 5.2 on the same page indicates the timing between two
sites to be +/-15 ns 3 sigma for the T-bolt

My take on this as an old microwave guy and non-timing expert is that
there are problems greater than splitter cross-talk and variations in 
cable
propagation delay at least for simple systems using only L1.

The more learned in these matters may be able to refine the above.

For those interested in measuring splitter effects,please remember that 
no
splitter will perform correctly unless terminated on ALL ports in its 
design
impedance. This is especially true for isolation.

- best regards john roos k6iql




_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





More information about the time-nuts mailing list