[time-nuts] Are serial port headers standardized?
Bob Camp
lists at rtty.us
Sun Oct 21 00:30:55 UTC 2012
Hi
I do believe I can top that one :)
Back in the 70's (do I need to mention jobs …) these were already an established item. Before that point (as in back in school … don't ask when that was) I spent some time modeling the charismatic impedance of the connector plus cable combination. Turns out that 120 ohms is a pretty good match…
Bob
On Oct 20, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:
> On 10/20/2012 04:15 PM, Sarah White wrote:
>> On 10/20/2012 10:06 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The IDC to 9 pin cables are a generic / cheap item on eBay or from Newegg. Less than $3 delivered last time I needed any.
>>>
>>> Bob
>> ((...snip...))
>>
>> Motherboard manual said:
>> "Connect one side of a switching cable to the header and then attach the
>> serial COM device to the other side of the cable."
>>
>> ... is "IDC" another way of saying this? what does the acronym represent?
>
> IDC block header is a more correct term as I recall it. Wikipedia concurs:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulation-displacement_connector
>
> Back in the 80thies when I had my first job, these 10-pin IDC block header serial cables was already an established standard. If you have hard serial interface on your motherboard, be lucky, plug it in and run!
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list