[time-nuts] Timing performance of servers

[Magnus Danielson]

Sarah,

On 10/25/2012 06:44 PM, Sarah White wrote:
> 1)
>
> Thanks magnus. This is something I'm quite interested in:
>
> I'm not the only one doing testing for Microsoft NT 5.x and higher
> against NTP-type synchronization. It's actually high enough quality such
> that a Windows server running NTP with a refclock provides significantly
> better time than the public NTP servers.
>
> Here are a few writeups I've been using for reference, and I've been
> testing and duplicating some of the listed configurations, hoping for my
> own writeups:
>
> http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-Vista.html (basic timing)
>
> http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-serial-port.html (connected
> to refclock, timing was better than 50 microseconds jitter, averaging
> less than 10 microseconds)
>
> Am actively in the process of getting everything to replace my own
> "navigation" GPS refclock with a timing mode one. At this point I just
> need to find a good antenna...

That's a whole lot of information there. Many thanks for those links.

Cheers,
Magnus