[time-nuts] OT - but of interest?

Peter Gottlieb nerd at verizon.net
Sat Apr 27 19:18:14 EDT 2013


An iPhone as a weapon of mass (times velocity squared) destruction.


On 4/27/2013 7:03 PM, J. Forster wrote:
> Putting 100,000 items in space is a non-starter. The existing space trash
> is already a big concern, and there have been seriuous proposals for
> missions to clean it up. An iPhone, travelling at orbital velocity, has a
> lot of kinetic energy!
>
> There was an uproar years ago when the Westford Needles experiment was
> launched, and those had a known mechanism to de-orbit the things.
>
> As to tossing one out the docking port, unstabilized objects will tumble.
> The chances of getting a useful picture of the area of interest are small.
>
> YMMV,
>
> -John
>
> ==============
>
>
>
>
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Gregory Muir <engineering at mt.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm curious if they ever have any problem with earth-based commercial
>>> component
>>> outgassing clouding the camera optics.
>> I went to a lecture on the idea of putting a cell phone like object in
>> orbit.  The idea was that it should have a cost and size about like a
>> phone.   This is very different from a pico-sat (a 4 inch cube)
>> because the pico sat costs $100,000 or more and the phone is under
>> $500   The idea is that $500 satellites you don't have to care about
>> failures.  The plan was to place maybe 100,000 devices in orbit and as
>> they fail just launch another 1,000 or so at a time.  The proposal was
>> to launch them from a rocket carried under an aircraft.
>>
>> The goal was an un-jamable world wide data network.  The phones would
>> self-organize into a mesh network.   But no one is going to do this.
>> But still the question lives on:  "What could you do with a iPhone in
>> orbit?"   One idea was diagnostics.  A big spacecraft like a space
>> station of crew capsule headed to mars might toss a few outside so
>> they could get photos of the exterior if they suspected a problem or
>> if the phone is cheap just to get  snapshot.  But I'd bet a bunch
>> they'd use a $100K pico sat for that.
>> --
>>
>> Chris Albertson
>> Redondo Beach, California
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3162/5777 - Release Date: 04/27/13
>
>



More information about the time-nuts mailing list