[time-nuts] Phase noise measurement with a scope

Chris Albertson albertson.chris at gmail.com
Thu Jun 13 00:00:05 EDT 2013


My dim memory says there is some analog way to multiply the phase noise.
 What does that?   Then it might be easier to measure.


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Marek Peca <marek at duch.cz> wrote:

> My point was, that DSO is basically an ADC. Therefore, there is some
>>> amount of noise, nonlinearity and drift, limiting the jitter measurement.
>>> Do you think any method can dig more information from given data than
>>> sinc() interpolation and zero-crossing computation?
>>>
>>
>  The cross-spectrum averaging does indeed do just that, relying on two
>> ADCs to produce uncorrelated noise, which can be averaged out.
>>
>> Or am I misunderstanding your point?
>>
>
> Nothing against that. It depends on what noise level after averaging you
> require. I only posted my experience with a very low-quality DSO, which has
> 100psRMS single-shot. Using sinc() interpolation, but my point was, that I
> suppose there is no way to obtain better single-shot performance than this.
> To average out 100psRMS to, say, 1psRMS, it would require 10^4 edges (under
> the assumption, that the 100psRMS is well behaved noise).
>
> What performance it could yield with a better scope? I hope I'll try
> LC584AL some day, I guess it might give sth like 10psRMS single-shot...
>
>
> Regards,
> Marek
> ______________________________**_________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
> and follow the instructions there.
>



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


More information about the time-nuts mailing list