[time-nuts] hp5065b !!!
mspencer12345 at yahoo.ca
Wed May 1 16:46:16 EDT 2013
On a related note does any one know the likely serial number ranges of the HP5065's that would benefit from this treatment ? (Or is there any other easy way to tell the units appart ?)
Thanks to all concerned for the effort put forwards on this project. It may sway me towards actually buying an HP5065 at some point in the future. The efforts are appreciated.
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 11:58:58 -0600
From: Ed Palmer <ed_palmer at sasktel.net>
To: time-nuts at febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] hp5065b !!!
Message-ID: <518157E2.2020008 at sasktel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Another factor that limits the (apparent) interest is that the 5065B is
one of the most expensive and hardest to find Rb standards around. Even
on the used market the price for a 5065B in good condition can be
breathtaking. If Corby's work can be extended to other, more common
units, the level of interest will explode. The question, of course, is
whether the more common units will see any improvement. Since not all
5065B units show the same improvement, I won't be holding my breath! :-)
On 5/1/2013 9:13 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> On 05/01/2013 03:26 PM, EWKehren at aol.com wrote:
>> The multiplier and output has been changed significantly. We can not
>> put a
>> finger on one part but if you reed the paper .
>> http://tf.boulder.nist.gov/general/pdf/1219.pdf that Bruce posted
>> it does explain the RF
>> significance.I ignored the laser part since I will not be able to
>> duplicate, but the
>> microwave part clearly outlines its contribution to performance.
>> Right now
>> we are doing it off list since there seems not to be much interest in
>> having H Maser like performance at home.
> There is at least from me, and I know others reads with interest.
> Remember that many remains silent on the list even if they read it
> with interest, so number of replies does not reflect interest.
More information about the time-nuts