[time-nuts] Atomic Watch.
azelio.boriani at screen.it
Wed May 1 14:32:43 EDT 2013
Yes, you're right: the radioactive decay is not involved. Anyway the CSAC
is not a primary reference (even if the Cs in used) as pointed out here
when the CSAC was first introduced. Nor a special permission has to be
asked to "wear" the CSAC.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Sarah White <kuzetsa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/1/2013 8:43 AM, Stephen Tompsett (G8LYB) wrote:
> Stephen, fellow time nuts,
> [DISCLAIMER] I should really know better than to attempt internet
> discussions or comments first thing after waking up. Didn't stop me
> today though (oops)
> Did I just make a fool of myself?
> Was I mistaken?
> I tweeted the author of this article, trying to point out that (as I
> understand) "radioactive decay" is not relevant in any way for cesium
> frequency standard/reference thingies:
> If someone more authoritative and/or experienced (or at least more
> awake) wanted, please let me know if I was confused and such
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts