[time-nuts] GSP clock stabilitiy, Rb vs Cs
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sat May 4 16:53:41 EDT 2013
In message <BB05041D-F03A-42AC-85C6-467110FC3466 at leapsecond.com>, "Tom Van Baak
(lab)" writes:
>Rule of thumb: quartz is best short term, Rb or H-maser mid-term,
>and Cs by far the best long-term.
I have never seen a technical description of the Cs used in the
early GPS satellites, but I have seen many references to all sorts
of troubles with them, including a much shorter lifetime than
was hoped for.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list