[time-nuts] FCC politics vs their engineers...
Rob Kimberley
robkimberley at btinternet.com
Wed Sep 18 06:36:55 EDT 2013
I remember a story told to me many years ago, about a discussion between an
American Astronaut and a Russian Cosmonaut.
It goes along something like this...
Astronaut to Cosmonaut: " I wouldn't be happy sitting on the top of that
low technology rocket"
Cosmonaut to Astronaut: "I would rather that than sit at the top of a pile
of low bids"
Rob K
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: 17 September 2013 19:19
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FCC politics vs their engineers...
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making
decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no
price for being wrong." - Thomas Sowell
YMMV,
-John
===============
> Was it not always so?? Remember the politicians pay the bills not the
> engineers!
> Alan
> G3NYK
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Williams" <wd6cmu at gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
> <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 7:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FCC politics vs their engineers...
>
>
>> "He tells me with some bitterness that politics triumphed over all of
>> the objections of the engineering staff to LS and that this is not
>> the first time that this has happened."
>>
>> That's how we ended up with Challenger and Columbia.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Michael Baker <mpb45 at clanbaker.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Time-Nutters--
>>>
>>> Jim wrote:
>>> snip
>>> > That's why the FCC granted a "conditional" waiver of the rules.
>>> > It was politically expedient, and I would imagine that the
>>> > engineers at the FCC thought "there's no way they'll be able to
>>> > demonstrate no interference"
>>>
>>> Charles wrote:
>>> snip
>>> > The Commission not only thought LS would demonstrate
>>> > non-interference, it put its thumb on the scale until the public
>>> > outcry became too loud to ignore (the GPS interests took forever
>>> > to wake up -- that didn't happen until all of the comment periods
>>> > were long closed). It just didn't matter what the staff engineers
>>> > thought -- which is business as usual at the FCC.
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------
>>>
>>> A friend of mine was one of the FCC lead supervisory engineers that
>>> was involved in the LS fiasco. He tells me that there were
>>> technical reports, evaluation summaries and strong opinions offered
>>> by the engineering staff that provided a number of reasons why the
>>> LS project should be denied. He tells me that most of these
>>> engineering studies got buried and ignored.
>>> He tells me with some bitterness that politics triumphed over all of
>>> the objections of the engineering staff to LS and that this is not
>>> the first time that this has happened.
>>>
>>> Mike Baker
>>> Gainesville, FL USA
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
>>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/list
>>> info/time-nuts>
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list