[time-nuts] sine to square wave converter
ed_palmer at sasktel.net
Thu Jul 10 16:17:12 EDT 2014
How much of an improvement does the LTC6957 give over, say, a simple
Actually, is there a list of different techniques and the performance of
each? I know that the LPRO Integration manual gives some good info for
phase noise, but I'm not aware of a similar document for slew rate (AKA
On 7/10/2014 12:40 PM, bruce at ko4bb.com wrote:
>> On July 10, 2014 at 10:55 AM EWKehren at aol.com wrote:
>> As part of the FE 405 B project a separate output circuit is in the works.
>> The universal controller and auxiliary board are the same as used in the
>> FE5680A GPSDO but because of the very low ADEV a separate circuit board that
>> divides by three and has also two ground isolated transformer outputs is in
>> the works.The question is what is the best sine to square wave converter
>> with the lowest ADEV contribution. I am looking at Bruce's circuit using the
>> ADCMP600. Any other ideas?
>> Thanks Bert Kehren
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> Although CERN likes that circuit for its ruggedness and versatility its a
> little noisier than some alternative circuits.
> Currently Linear Technology's sine to square wave devices with selectable
> filtering (LTC6957 series) are better in that they are a closer approximation to
> the ideal zero crossing detector.
> Failing that the next best is perhaps an AC coupled (both at input and between
> emitters) differential pair of 2N3906's or similar.
More information about the time-nuts