[time-nuts] Time-nuts question on message size??? 119KB vs 165KB
paulswedb at gmail.com
Fri Jul 11 16:33:14 EDT 2014
Thanks Tom and Hal I was trying to understand what the change was and now I
know the pix get bigger. I will keep that in mind for the future.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Tom Van Baak (lab) <tvb at leapsecond.com>
> Your expectation works for text attachments. But binary attachments (e.g.,
> jpg) expand about 33%. That's 8/6, or log2(256)/log2(64), due to base64
> encoding of 8-bit bytes.
> In general, large attachments on this list are ok. It's just that when
> they are above 128k they are temporarily held for manual review. I let most
> of them go through with little delay.
> /tvb (i5s)
> > On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:21 AM, paul swed <paulswedb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Trying to keep the message and attachements below the 128KB limit.
> > I send a 119KB message and it gets held as a 165KB message.
> > Can someone help me to understand the difference please?
> > Thanks
> > Paul
> > WB8TSL
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > and follow the instructions there.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts