[time-nuts] Mercury Ion Clock
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Sat Nov 1 14:05:20 EDT 2014
On 11/01/2014 05:49 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
> Having been to a few of the design reviews and such for the DSAC, and
> before, when it was called the 1 liter atomic clock, etc.
> I think one could build one *if* you have a fairly wide collection of
> skills, and you weren't hung up on it being tiny and low power, and zero
> For instance, building a perfectly sealed physics package that is space
> flight compatible is non-trivial. Most of us don't have e-beam welding
> equipment sitting around (nor does JPL.. we contract that kind of stuff
> out). As Prestage points out in the article below, they started looking
> at how they build long life Traveling Wave Tubes for space (another
> precision ion optics device), and having spent some time in various TWT
> factories over the past 15 years: there is a lot of art in the
> manufacturing process.
Ah, yes, *most* time-nuts is not aiming to shoot their clocks into deep
space. We are satisfied to stay in geostationary orbit or lower ;-)
> However, if you were happy with "lab grade" construction, and you have
> the Kurt Lesker and Duniway catalogs as bedside reading, I think you'd
> have a chance.
Yes. I guess a bit of baking out the build is also to be recommended.
I guess most of us don't do vacuum in our labs, so there is a challenge
in itself, as there is many beginners mistakes to be done there.
> The ion trap and such is a fairly straightforward thing, from what I
> understand: you need the usual vacuum pumps and such to build one. If
> you don't want it to run for years without servicing, then issues of the
> mercury content are less important.
> (BTW, the space clock uses thermal dissociation of HgO to get the mercury)
Have tou cared to get the right isotope or do you use the natural
abundance spreading? Hg-199 has an abundance of 16,87%.
> The PMT is an off the shelf thing. Check out the amateur built fusion
> reactor (fusor) websites on where to get PMTs and amplifiers (they're
> used behind a scintillator)
Ah yes. Got a NaI(Tl) scintilator with about 1 cm copper filter and a
matching PMT. No amp thought, but then again, I do not know what I
should measure with it. :)
> The 40 GHz stuff these days is not nearly as exotic as it used to be.
> The challenge might be test equipment when you're debugging your 40 GHz
> synthesis chain.
I was thinking the same, especially when consider optical clocks, then
40 GHz isn't as esoteric. Traditional cesiums and rubidiums use a pair
of synthesized frequencies being then sent into a step-recover diode
inside a tuned cavity which then does the mixing and selects the right
> I don't think it would be *easy*, but I think doable, and nothing in the
> system is particularly expensive or that exotic. It's sort of like
> telescope building.. The raw materials to make a 18" reflector telescope
> aren't all that expensive, nor is there some secret sauce: it's just
> time to grind the mirror (and recover from mistakes) and build the system.
Would be a fun project to do, things to be learned.
More information about the time-nuts