[time-nuts] Lucent KS-24361 GPSDO arrived today several questions
GandalfG8 at aol.com
GandalfG8 at aol.com
Fri Nov 7 12:39:21 EST 2014
Are you sure you've got the COM port set up correctly?
Should be 9600 baud, 8 data bits, 1 stop bit, No parity, No flow control
In SatStat, for example, you should get a message on startup that says....
To Start: Select port Open on the CommPort Menu...
If you do this, assuming the correct settings, it should bring up a
Communication Established, Please Wait
Then the SatStat Info page should open.
This is with the Symmetricom Windows version of SatStat, version 5, do you
see any of this when you try to start it?
In a message dated 07/11/2014 17:14:54 GMT Standard Time, aroby at antamy.com
My frustration with getting anything out of the Diag port onto a PC
continues. I received an RS422 to USB cable and also an RS422 to RS232
convertor but neither of them has given me any success, on either box. I can see
data coming out of the port on my scope, on top of a noisy 1.2V line, but
cannot get a terminal program, SatStat or Z38XX to display anything. It's
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 6:42 AM
To: GandalfG8 at aol.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Lucent KS-24361 GPSDO arrived today several
Well, it took me a *long* time to get around to the command line on these
boxes. For what ever reason (yes one could guess ? ) I stayed focused on
finding a 3810/11/12 manual rather than dropping back to the 3801 manual.
Now the question becomes that magic 10 pin header on the board. If it ??s
jumpers (might not be) one of them could enable bi-directional
Thanks for checking this to see that it works on at least one other box.
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 4:03 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
<time-nuts at febo.com> wrote:
> Hi Bob
> Very many thanks for the prod re the Diagnostic port.
> Considering the other GPS kit I talk to using Hyperterminal and the
> like, often because there's no other option, I don't know why it's
> never occurred to me to do the same with the Z3801As and now these......
> and any rude suggestions as to why will just be politely ignored:-)
> It's not that I don't have access to the command set, but I suspect
> that twelve years or so ago, totally green when it came to GPSDOs and
> with my first Z3801A to play with, I was just grateful to find
> SatStat, and eventually some nice commercial options, and never gave
> it a thought after that, silly me.
> Anyway, I've just switched my Z3811A comms over to Hyperterminal and
> tried the :SYST:STAT? command for starters.
> That's obviously what SatStat uses to generate it's front page,
> although it is continuously updated with SatStat, and we do have
> contact, and something else to play with:-)
> In a message dated 07/11/2014 00:07:56 GMT Standard Time,
> kb8tq at n1k.org
> Ok, I got to spend a little quality time with my pair today. I mostly
> poked at the Diag port with a terminal program.
> Both of the units seem talk over the Diag port regardless of the mode
> they are in (master / slave / fault ). Both respond to a sub-set of
> the Z3801 SCPI commands (= not all commands work). There are a few
> enhancements where a query to a ??node ?? gives a reply (which it
should not if it ??s ??node only ??
> ). All of it works ok at 9600 baud 8N1. All of it comes back with an
> error message (E-xxx) after a valid command response. It may not like
> the terminal program sending cr/lf or something like that.
> By far the most useful thing to type is :SYST:STAT?
> That executes the system:status request and gives you a nice full
> screen of information. It shows you about 95% of the useful
> information all on one page. About the only major thing missing is
> the DAC value. That ??s available with another command out of the
> Z3801 list. It does take a while to compose and transmit the screen,
> so it ??s not the best way to to this forever and ever.
> The data from the request is the same on both boxes. Same everything
> except one shows as standby etc. The interesting details are things
> like elevation mask and cable delay. Why interesting? You can set them
> with discrete commands. You can also query the data with the same
> commands to make sure the box ??took ?? what you sent.
> This allows experimentation with changing the elevation mask on each
> box (or just simply doing a discrete query for the mask on each box).
> The Ref-0 / slave will happily change things around with discrete
> commands. None of them are reflected in the :SYST:STAT? listing on
> the Ref-0 or Ref-1. When you look at the Ref-1 / gps box, it ??s
> discrete query information matches the :SYST:STAT? screen on both
> boxes. When you change things on the Ref-1 box both screens follow that
> ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
> When you pull the antenna on the gps box, it immediately (almost)
> goes into gps fault led flashing mode. The slave box happily sits
> there for a while (say a minute) with it ??s gps led saying all is
> well. When you plug the antenna back in, the process is reversed. The
> gps box goes out of flash mode right away. The led goes out in a bit.
> The led on the slave box does not follow for a minute or so.
> ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
> All of this suggests to me that the Ref-0 / slave does not talk back
> to the other box via serial. It also suggests to me that all it
> ??sees ?? from the Ref-1/gps box are the duplicates of the serial
> string out of the Motorola gps module. The Ref-0 just figures out
> what ??s happening by watching those strings as they roll by.
> Hope that makes sense ? .
> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
> If that ??s all true, it should be ??easy ?? to put dummy gps
> sentences into the Ref-0 interface port and a pps from something
> else. Once it sees stuff that it likes, it will start locking up to
> that pps. Cheap micro and just about any modern gps = fancy new
> GPSDO. Quick / easy / not much work. A little more complex if you
> decide to translate sawtooth data. That of course assumes these boxes
do anything with sawtooth ...
>> On Nov 6, 2014, at 7:52 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
> <time-nuts at febo.com> wrote:
>> Hi Bob
>> I view the master/slave situation the same way you do, but only
>> because Lucent effectively sets things up the other way round so
>> just wanted to be sure which way Paul was considering it.
>> As regards, the "faking", yes, a single 15 way plug containing just
>> and a resistor is exactly what I use now.
>> I realise the RS422 fudge isn't ideal but certainly very handy for
>> some quick tests.
>> I've got two or three RS422 PCI interfaces but hadn't previously had
>> spare slots, now I've got a couple of lovely Magma 13 way PCI
>> but need to hack them about so the ports are at the front.
>> Whoever decided rack mount PC kit should be built with all the
>> at the rear must have been really nuts, and it was too long ago to
>> use "corridors" of racks as a viable excuse, someone somewhere just
> ears to
>> desk top style cases and left the rest of us to get on with it..
>> One of the best things I ever did was to buy a pair of "back to
>> rackmount PC cases with all ports and cards available at the front,
> trouble is
>> now I want everything else to match, and most test gear has just the
>> All good fun, and certainly never a dull moment:-)
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts