[time-nuts] OCXO Phase Noise Measurement in Primitive Conditions
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Tue Sep 2 17:14:58 EDT 2014
Just realized I forgot to mention this...
As you have sawtooth data, one fun way to compare the GPS-OCXO is just
use the sawtooth data and then let TimeLab do the phase-unwrapping on
that. This will however not give good characterization of the stability
of the PPS output, which is the result of the 10 MHz OCXO corrected into
PPS-time, for that you either need to measure a reference to the OCXO or
to the PPS.
On 09/02/2014 10:46 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
> I knew I was missing something! I'll warm up the Rb and test against that again.
> From: Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org>
> To: time-nuts at febo.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 3:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OCXO Phase Noise Measurement in Primitive Conditions
> Well, in that case you do measure a form of noise-floor rather than
> measuring the OCXO performance, as OCXO performance is being corrected
> out in the PPS position (and sawtooth-correction).
> If you want to measure that OCXO performance, you need to do that
> against an independent PPS.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts