[time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPSsignalfromaGPSreceiver.
tmiller11147 at verizon.net
Mon Sep 15 15:04:23 EDT 2014
So does adding ~80 pF per meter or 8 nF for 100 meters (RG58) to your output
have any effect on the risetime? Because that is what it will see with an
I am sure you can make a case for some condition(s) where an unterminated
cable will still work. But it is not something we have been shown necessary
to make precise measurements (something this group strives for).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike S" <mikes at flatsurface.com>
To: <time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1
> On 9/15/2014 10:01 AM, Tom Miller wrote:
>> Fast risetime pulses _are_ RF and need to be treated as such.
> You say that as if simply saying it provides an explanation, or even a
> reason. Exactly what ill effect on a triggered measurement is there if one
> does not terminate a PPS signal properly? Does/can termination increase
> the slew rate or make the speed of propagation more consistent, which
> might make the measurement more accurate?
> Like Tom said, what comes after the leading edge of a PPS signal (which is
> the measurement trigger) seems irrelevant.
> A simple though experiment. If I take a high impedance measurement at a
> tap 1M from the source, and the cable ends another 100M away, how can the
> termination or lack thereof at that end effect my measurement of a single
> event? It's over 700 ns round trip away? If I repeat that event 1/sec, is
> it any different? I can see where there would be a difference when I get
> close to a 700 ns cycle time, and likely before because of "ringing." But
> for a 1 second cycle? Someone will have to provide more than a dismissive
> "just because" to convince me.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts