[time-nuts] WWVB d-psk-r down conversion method
paulswedb at gmail.com
Mon Sep 22 20:03:48 EDT 2014
The goal is to remove the psk so the old phase tracking receivers can work.
Whats good about this as I just typed to Bob the signal is slow and easy to
>From what I have seen the phase tracking receivers have a fairly long time
constant. So the fact that the phase detect and flip occurs 1/10 of a
second later should not have any effect on these radios.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Charles Steinmetz <csteinmetz at yandex.com>
> Paul wrote:
> One of the methods suggested for working with the wwvb psk is down
>> converting to a lower frequency. When experimenting with NAA I had built a
>> 24 Khz receiver that down converted that signal to a 100 Hz base band.
>> It was a minor effort to shift it to 60 Khz by changing the LO.
>> * * *
>> for 100 Hz the LO must be at 60.1 or 59.9 Khz. Or synthesize it etc.
>> * * *
>> Not sure there is a real need to lock the LO at all.
> I'm not sure I understand how this helps.
> I thought the point of removing the PSK was to reconstitute a version of
> the original unmodulated carrier, so it can be used to discipline an
> oscillator at some convenient frequency (the PSK needs to be removed
> because it upsets the PLL phase detector). That works (in theory) with a
> TRF receiver, because the received carrier IS the tx carrier that is locked
> to a standard at the transmitter (modified by the propagation delay and
> delay variation, and then by doubling/squaring). But once you convert the
> received frequency by using a LO (or BFO, whichever you want to call it),
> the recovered carrier frequency is dependent on BOTH the tx frequency AND
> the LO/BFO frequency. You have lost the link to the tx frequency standard.
> Am I misunderstanding the goal of the exercise?
> Best regards,
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts