[time-nuts] 58503A stats
alan.ambrose at anagram.net
Tue Aug 4 04:49:58 EDT 2015
Here is a screen capture from excellent Ulrich's Z38XX program:
This is the first time that I've seen this output and I have a couple of questions. I should explain that the antenna is fairly well situated in London UK with a good view south with no obstacles and ~5m above and away from any other roofs. There are 3 small skyscrapers about ½ mile distance at 140° azimuth and 15° elevation. There are however obstructions about 4m away to the NW & SW (around 240° and 330°) limiting the view to 45° elevation. The device is a 58503A (it might be some dodgy far east 're-manufacture') with tracking of max 6 active sats. I've set the elevation mask temporarily to 0° to get the fullest map - as you can see that doesn't make much difference.
+ I was surprised to see such a noisy EFC signal - I assumed that the EFC changed v. gradually on a slow loop - maybe with temperature and aging. However there's a lot of high frequency crud there which I don't understand.
+ The 'holdover uncertainty predict' seems to go on a daily loop along with the EFC from 1.5 to 2.4us - presumably with temperature? If that's normal behaviour it suggests that the DOCXO isn't that well thermally managed?
+ The holdover uncertainty and the 1 pps variance don't relate at all to the occasional drop down to 3 sats. So some other effect is at work here - is this just ionosphere and general short term GPS inaccuracy only?
+ The time stability measures are not credible in their relentless plunge downward?
+ The azimuth/elevation chart looks about right except for the view to the south (say 150° to 220°) where I would expect at least as good as the view to the east - say by another 20° of elevation? (There's a point at 0/0 which I'm sure is an artefact caused by temporary '---' characters in the El/Az output of the device.) I don't have many ideas on this as the view is dead good. Any thoughts?
+ There's v little below 20° elevation - I think the view is clear though for most of the S azimuth down to ~0°. Is this simply because the device tends to ignore low elevation sats in its tracking because it has better ones to play with?
Would all you greybeards out there give the benefit of your hard-won experience and/or maybe there are other people's charts to compare with?
More information about the time-nuts