[time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the definition of the second

Didier Juges shalimr9 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 05:20:12 EST 2015

I have a page that illustrates how you can use a delay line and a mixer to separately obtain AM and PM


Didier KO4BB

On January 14, 2015 1:19:11 PM CST, Mike Feher <mfeher at eozinc.com> wrote:
>At those low levels, how does one differentiate between phase or AM
>noise? Thanks & Regards - Mike 
>Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
>89 Arnold Blvd.
>Howell, NJ, 07731
>732-886-5960 office
>908-902-3831 cell
>-----Original Message-----
>From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Bruce
>Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:22 AM
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Current state of optical clocks and the
>definition of the second
>Although the phase noise when using optical combs to generate Rf
>signals is low there is no mention of the am noise.
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to
>and follow the instructions there.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Razr HD 4G LTE wireless tracker while I do other things.

More information about the time-nuts mailing list