[time-nuts] Divider circuit for Rubidium Standard

Alex Pummer alex at pcscons.com
Wed May 20 23:27:55 EDT 2015


once upon the time at Gigatronics we compared logic devices noise and 
found that  TTL were the quietest
73
KJ6UHN Alex


On 5/20/2015 3:15 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
>
>
> On 5/20/2015 11:22 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>
>>
>> The older HP counter manuals explained it very nicely too, as they
>> illustrated the slew-rate & amplitude noise to time-noise conversion.
>>
>> What do amazes me is the fact that I've yet to see a counter input
>> channel which takes care to square up the signal properly, they rather
>> provide the comparator after the obvious damping and AC-blocking
>> conditioning. I can't even recall that there where much such shaping as
>> a side-product.
>
> The counter front ends seem to be modeled after scope front ends
> and scope triggering circuits, where you can adjust the triggering
> level.  Any jitter in the triggering would normally only affect
> the interpolator.  The interpolators in general were no great shakes,
> so the triggering wasn't the limiting factor.
>
>
>> Now, remind me why ECL is lousy, I can't recall there being very high
>> gain in them, but fairly high bandwidth and they stay in the linear
>> operation region.
>>
>
>> Magnus
>> _______________________________________________
>
> ECL is bad because the voltage swing is low; because as you say,
> a lot of the circuitry is in the active region all the time, and
> because the current source in the emitters generates a lot of
> noise.
>
> In the early 1990's, I thought I had proved that the high ECL
> noise was mostly common mode and that you could reduce it
> 20 dB by using a transformer to couple the output.  Alternately,
> a good differential amplifier with high CMRR would do the trick.
> I had actual measurements to back up this theory.
>
> Subsequently, other people tried to reproduce this and could not.
> By that time, I had moved on and didn't have the bandwidth to
> continue to own the problem.
>
> It would make a nice project for some time-nut to prove or disprove
> my hypothesis regarding ECL.
>
> ECL line receivers as squarers are not as bad as comparators, but
> are much noisier than 74AC.
>
> Rick Karlquist N6RK
>
> Rick Karlquist N6RK
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



More information about the time-nuts mailing list