[time-nuts] Anybody want a Thunderbolt power supply?
artgodwin at gmail.com
Wed Aug 31 16:52:50 EDT 2016
I'm being Devil's Advocate here because I certainly realise switchers do
generate high frequency noise. But wasn't the intention of them to make
filtering easier, with smaller filter components, exactly because they
operate at higher frequencies ?
So why do they fail ? Is it cost-cutting to make them only just good enough
for typical uses ? Shouldn't it be possible to make the best possible
supply from a switcher, if only cost and weight weren't the first
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Mark Sims <holrum at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, at times I used a two stage linear regulator. The first stage had
> excellent low freq rejection and the final stage too care of the high freq
> Some times a full linear supply is not a viable option due to power
> dissipation/size issues or the utter convenience of using a switching wall
> > Precisely the reason to avoid switchers entirely and use linear-only
> voltage regulators to power noise-sensitive circuits. As I mentioned
> before, I had to use two stages of well-designed linear regulation to
> make any switching supply acceptable (at a time-nuts level) for use with
> a Tbolt.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts