[time-nuts] Totally unrelated, but..
Van Horn, David
david.vanhorn at backcountryaccess.com
Thu Dec 8 11:45:59 EST 2016
Possible, but it should not need that, and the original design didn't include it.
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Hal Murray
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 10:35 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Cc: hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Totally unrelated, but..
kb8tq at n1k.org said:
>> the cool thing about those parts is that their PSRR extends up to
>> several MHz. A lot of LDOs have good PSRR to kHz.
> Which to bring it back to noise in radios ….. could be the issue
> there. The device isn’t oscillating, it’s just not blocking the crud from upstream.
Would a simple L-C type filter on the input side solve that?
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the time-nuts