[time-nuts] Phase Noise Comparisons
Magnus Danielson
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Sun Jan 17 01:27:52 EST 2016
Yes. Thanks Ulrich!
Cheers,
Magnus
On 01/17/2016 02:00 AM, KA2WEU--- via time-nuts wrote:
> Did my plot make it ? Ulrich
>
>
> In a message dated 1/16/2016 7:01:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> rob at nc0b.com writes:
>
> I did some interpolation to compare the specs for phase noise of the 8660
> the way it was done then to the present method. I think it is going to be
> something like -105 dBc/Hz to -110 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset at 14 MHz carrier
> frequency.
>
>
>
> As a comparison, the 8662A is about -135 dBc/Hz and the 8642A is better
> than -150 dBc/Hz.
>
> Actual measurements on multiple generators in my lab. Unfortunately I
> have never used or measured an 8660.
>
>
>
> 3335A -128 dBc/Hz
>
> 3336C -120 dBc/Hz
>
> 3325A -115 dBc/Hz (original version. Later improved by 4 pr 5 dB after
> the 3336C came out.)
>
>
>
> As a comparison a Rigol DG4162 is -115 dBc/Hz All at 10 kHz offset and on
> the 20 meter band.
>
>
>
> It depends what you are trying to measure. Sensitivity or noise floor,
> anything will work within the range of specified output accuracy and leakage.
> On the other hand, if you are trying to measure the dynamic range of a
> receiver, or its phase noise characteristics, you cannot do that with most
> generators.
>
>
>
> Rob, NC0B
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list