[time-nuts] Switching transistors, current sources, nonidealties and noise
scott.j.stobbe at gmail.com
Sun Jul 3 13:48:03 EDT 2016
The transition frequency of a transistor is more of a ballpark figure of
merit than a device specific constant, as it is also a function of how the
device is biased. Since most amplifiers and oscillators need power gain to
operate, current gain is usually needed (though you could use voltage gain
at the expensive of bandwidth) making ft a useful figure. The transition
frequency is also a good proxy for the effective junction capacitances and
forward transit time of the device.
For a current source, the desired outcome is for the circuit to output one
specific current and no other. So, having a large forward ac-current
bandwidth is not of great importance, as you don't want it to react at all,
you want it to keep sinking/sourcing one current value.
The issue you are having with your circuit is in biasing and loop
compensation. The standard spice model for a transistor does not include
lead inductance (most manufactures will provide a subcircuit model for
their device which includes package parasitics). Referencing the schematic
you previously attached, once your servo amplifier runs out of steam, if Q7
were a 2N3904 looking into the emitter of the device would look like a
10-15 Ohm resistor (1/gm + Rs/beta) in series with a 200 - 250 nH inductor
(tf Rs). When you changed to a BFU520 you lowered the impedance seen at the
base of Q16.
As a test for yourself, If you drive the base of Q16 with an appropriately
chosen voltage source (roughly 3.2 to 3.3 V) you will see a 2n3904 perform
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:45:36 -0400
> Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you need higher output resistance you will have to move to a FET based
> > approach. If you need less than 1 pF of output capacitance you will need
> > better transistor and care in how you physically construct your circuit.
> I do not think that the output resistance is really the limiting effect
> here, but rather the speed at which the transistor reacts, ie its f_t.
> But I have to admit that I have not fully understood the circuits
> behaviour yet. I still lack good understanding of how a transistor
> behaves under high frequency conditions :-/
> Attila Kinali
> Malek's Law:
> Any simple idea will be worded in the most complicated way.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts