[time-nuts] GPS for Nixie Clock

Tommy Phone tholmes at woh.rr.com
Sat Jul 16 09:31:55 EDT 2016


How about monitoring the Nixie tube current instead of light output. I have a strong suspicion that there's a good correlation between the two. 

From Tom Holmes, N8ZM

> On Jul 15, 2016, at 11:40 PM, jimlux <jimlux at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/15/16 5:25 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> You can do a pretty good job with a high speed photo diode. They are not cheap, but
>> you can get fast ones if your Visa card is up to it.
>> 
>> The next layer will be that at the relatively low strike voltages normally used, Nixie’s don’t
>> light up consistently. You either need to compensate for temperature and ambient light / then
>> calibrate each segment or sense each one as it turns on. Either way … it’s a major learning
>> experience just to get it into the microseconds range. You can get to nanoseconds, but that
>> may or may not be possible with conventional Nixie’s.
> 
> Preionize the gas with a radioactive source. If it works for Krytrons, it can work for Nixies. You could also use a pulsed ion source that turns on slightly before the "top of the second" to irradiate and prepare the Nixie.
> 
> A true time-nut won't let such thing stand in the way of perfection.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Once you have them turned on, you go back through something similar when you turn them
>> off. It takes a bit of time for all the little gas molecules to go back to rest state. The data I have seen
>> on that sort of thing suggests a “many microseconds” to millisecond decay process depending
>> on the gas and how it was driven.
> 
> Turning an ionized gas off is always harder than turning it on.  Perhaps a tailbiter type circuit or a negative pulse generator?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



More information about the time-nuts mailing list