[time-nuts] GPS message jitter (was GPS for Nixie Clock)
John Ackermann N8UR
jra at febo.com
Tue Jul 19 07:48:44 EDT 2016
Long ago I measured the impact of the linux low_latency flag on a 16550 UART. I don't know where that data is sitting now, but I remember that it made a significant difference.
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 9:59 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> jimlux at earthlink.net said:
>> except that virtually every UART in use today has some sort of buffering
>> (whether a FIFO or double buffering) between the CPU interface and the bits
>> on the wire, which completely desynchronizes the bits on the wire from the
>> CPU interface.
> The idea was to reduce the CPU load processing interrupts by batching things
> Some of those chips generate an interrupt when the see a return or line-feed
> Most of them have an option to disable that batching. On Linux the setserial
> command has a low_latency option. I haven't measured the difference. It
> would be a fun experiment.
> These are my opinions. I hate spam.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts