[time-nuts] Leap second to be introduced at midnight UTC December 31 this year
tholmes at woh.rr.com
Thu Jul 21 15:03:01 EDT 2016
Does your proposal allow for a Zero leap second, or does it require either plus or minus 1 to work? Seems like you could stay closer to the true value if you also have a zero option. Might also cause less consternation for some services, like the finance and scientific worlds, that seem to have critical issues when an LS appears.
I like your point that by having it occur monthly it forces systems to address issues promptly, and maybe that's the argument for the non-zero option.
Tom Holmes, N8ZM
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Tom Van Baak
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 1:28 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts at febo.com>
Cc: Leap Second Discussion List <leapsecs at leapsecond.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Leap second to be introduced at midnight UTC December 31 this year
Time to mention this again...
If we adopted the LSEM (Leap Second Every Month) model then none of this would be a problem. The idea is not to decide *if* there will be leap second, but to force every month to have a leap second. The IERS decision is then what the *sign* of the leap second should be this month.
Note this would keep |DUT1| < 1 s as now. UT1 would stay in sync with UTC, not so much by rare steps but by dithering. There would be no change to UTC or timing infrastructure because the definition of UTC already allows for positive or negative leap seconds in any given month.
Every UTC-aware device would 1) know how to reliably insert or delete a leap second, because bugs would be found by developers within a month or two, not by end-users years or decades in the future, and 2) every UTC-aware device would have an often tested direct or indirect path to IERS to know what the sign of the leap second will be for the current month.
The leap second would then become a normal part of UTC, a regular monthly event, instead of a rare, newsworthy exception. None of the weird bugs we continue to see year after year in leap second handling by NTP and OS's and GPS receiver firmware would occur.
Historical leap second tables would consist of little more than 12 bits per year.
Moreover, in the next decade or two or three, if we slide into an era where average earth rotation slows from 86400.1 to 86400.0 to 86399.9 seconds a day, there will be zero impact if LSEM is already in place.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts