[time-nuts] NCOCXO anyone?
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
richard at karlquist.com
Fri Jul 22 12:22:02 EDT 2016
On 7/22/2016 2:22 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Hoi Rick,
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:47:24 -0700
> "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard at karlquist.com> wrote:
>> Also in 1996, phase microsteppers were already legacy
>> technology and didn't have a good reputation for spectral
>> purity. Another non-panacea.
> If they are legacy, what is current state of the art?
> And is that how your DDS approach came to be?
> Attila Kinali
Yes the DDS papers of 1995/1996 were in response to
the limitations of phase microsteppers. I have been
out of the precision frequency field since 1998,
so I can't speak for the current state of the art.
More information about the time-nuts