[time-nuts] Thinking outside the box a super reference
eric at scace.org
Thu Nov 3 18:05:27 EDT 2016
> On 2016 Nov 03, at 16:07 , Bert Kehren via time-nuts <time-nuts at febo.com> wrote:
> Over the past there has been talk about building from scratch high
> performance references. I think consensus was that it is out of reach. In the mean
> time Corby is reworking an active maser which takes a lot of know how. But
> let us look at his work on the super HP5065. It is able to outperform a
> passive maser in the below 100 second range! Long term a proper GPSDO should
> be possible to step in. We are working on it including pressure and
> temperature control. To make full use of it you also need to have the capability
> to monitor, record and analyze on a continuous basis preferably with out
> tying up expensive equipment. We have the pieces in place and looking forward
> of combining all the pieces and compare with Corby’s active Maser. We are
> back to the GPSDO after being distracted by Tbolt performance. A third party
> is working combining the GPSDO data stream with the data from the unit that
> generates frequency, pressure and temperature data along with time to a
> USB stick, while also be able to monitor with a PC.
> I know it is considered by some heresy but our lack of a Maser and in Juerg
> ’s case no access to one, we try to overcome it with a GPSDO tailored for
> Rb and Cs and control our Cs’s C field .
> There was a time that I did have a HP5065A but got rid of it when I got
> some Cs’s. My best counter was A HP5345 and even with a Tracor 527 1 second
> performance was not an issue. That changed when Corby introduced me to time
> nuts and frankly it was the first time I learned about ADEV. But the
> HP5065A was gone. Now I have a cell that Corby has plotted and time permitting
> may become a project.
> Let me get to the real issue. There are not enough HP5065A’s out there and
> not affordable for all time nuts. Most are being kept and are not for
> sale. But if a combined effort by many time nuts it MAY be possible to recreate
> the guts of the HP5065A. The key word is MAY. 200 time nuts be willing to
> invest $ 5000 each may get us there. The market does not justify such an
> effort but time nuts keep bringing up discussions. All the other ideas kicked
> around in the past will cost more. There are some among us that know what
> it cost and who can make the key elements like lamps, cells, filters etc.
> Just a thought outside the box and hopefully may turn in to a limited
> constructive dialog. We will continue on our path, which include FRK/M100, HP5065
> and Cs.
> We would not be capable to contribute technically on the physics package
> but I would be willing to contribute financially and with monitoring
> equipment even if I would not be around when finished.
> Bert Kehren
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts