[time-nuts] Thinking outside the box a super reference
bownes at gmail.com
Fri Nov 4 21:40:45 EDT 2016
Not to mention there is not so sensitive film, sensitive film and really sensitive film.
Good old orthographic film took minutes in bright light.
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 20:24, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <c57q1c5engv94amimot7pu3l8romu6g2p0 at 4ax.com>, David writes:
>> Various online sources say that natural rubidium is radioactive enough
>> to fog photographic film in 1 to 2 months but that is also the case
>> with unprocessed uranium ore so I would not worry about it at all.
> Yes, that sounds about right for an isotope with a 40 billion years
> 1 to 2 months is a LOOOONG time for photographic film.
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts