[time-nuts] How phase stable is rg59 or alternate coax
David G. McGaw
david.g.mcgaw at dartmouth.edu
Tue Nov 22 09:19:35 EST 2016
Note that partial air core (9913) and foam dielectric is better than
On 11/21/16 5:39 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
> At one point I contemplated running Andrews "Heliax" for my GPS antenna. Part of the rationale was due to the data presented in page 2 of the following paper.
> I subsequently decided to stay with my existing run of plenum rated RG58. The bulk of my cable run is indoors where the temperature is fairly stable.
> Mark Spencer
>> On Nov 21, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Scott Stobbe <scott.j.stobbe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> When I first took a look at some of the coax datasheets I couldn't find
>> anything. I was able to find the following paper "phase stability of
>> typical navy radio frequency coaxial cables"
>> http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/628682.pdf I attached the table
>> from the last page. They estimate RG59 to have a tempCo of -330 PPM/degC
>> for electrical length. They also estimated RG-58 at -480 PPM/degC.
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:44 PM, John Ackermann N8UR <jra at febo.com> wrote:
>>> I can't find the data right now, but will keep digging. There's also a
>>> short paper from the early 2000s from Haystack on their measurement of
>>> LMR400 in an environmental chamber. They came to the same conclusion, but
>>> I can't find that paper either. :-
>> John, many thanks for the Haystack tip! That is a wonderful paper, I
>> believe the one you are quoting is "Dispersion and temperature effects in
>> coax cables" http://www.haystack.mit.edu/tech/vlbi/mark5/mark5_memos/067.pdf
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts