[time-nuts] WWV receivers?
nsayer at kfu.com
Sat Oct 29 01:36:47 EDT 2016
That single-chip version is going to have a *LOT* less (and less variable) latency than an SDR.
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:20 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <5A002554-8D90-4C75-95DA-21DB45D61E95 at kfu.com>, Nick Sayer via time-
> nuts writes:
>> If you’re in North America, a CHU receiver is a lot easier to make
>> than WWV/WWVH. The CHU timecode is just BEL 103 AFSK at 300 baud -
>> it was a one-chip solution 20 years ago when I made one in college.
> We have CPUs and sounds-cards these days...
> Also: The KiwiSDR is nearly perfect hardware, no matter which VLF/HF
> station you want: You can track GPS and four (possibly 8) VLF/HF
> stations at the same time.
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the time-nuts