[time-nuts] WWV receivers?
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Sat Oct 29 02:01:52 EDT 2016
nsayer at kfu.com said:
> That single-chip version is going to have a *LOT* less (and less variable)
> latency than an SDR.
Latency isn't an issue as long as it is known so that you can correct for it.
Has anybody measured the jitter through SDR and/or tried to reduce it? I'd
expect that even if you counted cycles and such there would still be jitter
from not being able to reproduce cache misses and interrupts.
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the time-nuts