[time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed

Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Sun Apr 2 23:05:55 EDT 2017

For even more fun you could try to detect the PTFE phase change  at around 20C using a cable with PTFE dielectric.

A pulse source with somewhat more pulse to pulse jitter may be more useful in that averaging will occur over a wider range of fine interpolator codes.


>     On 03 April 2017 at 05:34 Mark Sims <holrum at hotmail.com> wrote:
>     I implemented the channel offset compensation feature specifically to make measuring cable delays more accurate. I wanted to measure my TDR calibration cable and another very precision delay line. I used Heather to null out the channel/connector delays and then replaced one of the "T" cables with the TDR cable.
>     My test setup / TICC was coming up with a -306 ps channel offset error. The test signal was the 1PPS output of a FTS4060 cesium. Connecting / reconnecting one of the test setup cables and re-doing the offset test (I was averaging for 1800 seconds) could produce compensation values that varied from -300 ps to -325 ps. Just de-doing the offset test without messing with the cables produced values around -300 to -310 ps.
>     BNC connectors aren't the best for precision timing. I need to re-run the test with SMA cables / T adapter and the precision HP connector torque wrench and see what that looks like. It would also be fun to lay a coax outdoors and see how the delay changes over a day as it heats/cools.
>     --------------------
>         > > 
> >         Some “cables” have very long delay numbers.
> > 
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> >         To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >         and follow the instructions there.
> > 
> >     > 

More information about the time-nuts mailing list