[time-nuts] Atomic clocks and Wassenaar agreement

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <20170820181537.a7a834e32b848ea3f63d3943 at kinali.ch>, Attila Kinali writes:
>On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 11:28:17 +0000

>> [1] I've always wondered about that rule and I suspect it is a
>>     mistake.  Knowing who is on this list, I imagine that the next
>>     revision will read the far more sensible: "Non-rubidium *or*
>>     having ..."
>
>Yes, singling out Rubidium is kind of weird.

I see that rule as a way to carve out telco-class rubidiums, and
that's why I think "or" would make much more sense than "and".

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.