[time-nuts] Bye-Bye Crystals
kb8tq at n1k.org
Mon Mar 13 22:01:10 EDT 2017
If your application is happy with 0.1% accuracy, you use a simple crystal that costs
< 10 cents. If your application requires <0.001% accuracy, you probably are better
off using a packaged oscillator.
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 8:11 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> jimlux at earthlink.net said:
>> what about cheap crystals for microcontrollers.. I think the Arduino, for
>> instance, uses a crystal (and the oscillator electronics are inside the
>> Atmel part)
> I assume you can save a few pennies if you use a raw crystal rather than an
> oscillator. That probably matters in high volume low cost applications.
> Atmel has the technology for making oscillators. That's an analog-ish corner
> on what is mostly a digital chip. A lot of their chips are low standby power
> which generally means an older digital process with thicker oxides that don't
> leak as much. That probably makes analog corners easier, but I'm far from a
> wizard at that area.
> These are my opinions. I hate spam.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts