[time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed
csteinmetz at yandex.com
Fri Mar 31 21:00:33 EDT 2017
> I thought about using the clamp diodes as protection but was a bit worried about power supply noise leaking through the diodes and adding some jitter to the input signals...
It is a definite worry even with a low-noise, 50 ohm input, and a
potential disaster with a 1Mohm input. Common signal diodes (1N4148,
1N914, 1N916, 1N4448, etc.) are specified for 5-10nA of reverse current.
Even a low-leakage signal diode (e.g., 1N3595) typically has several
hundred pA of leakage. Note that the concern isn't just power supply
noise -- the leakage current itself is quite noisy.
For low-picoamp diodes at a decent price, I use either (1) the B-C diode
of a small-signal BJT, or (2) the gate diode of a small-geometry JFET.
A 2N5550 makes a good high-voltage, low-leakage diode with leakage
current of ~30pA. Small signal HF transistors like the MPSH10 and
2N5179 (and their SMD and PN variants) are good for ~5pA, while the gate
diode of a PN4417A JFET (or SMD variant) has reverse leakage current of
~1pA (achieving this in practice requires a very clean board and good
I posted some actual leakage test results to Didier's site, which can be
This document shows the connections I used to obtain the data.
> The TICC doesn't have the resolution for it to matter or justify a HP5370 or better quality front end. I'll probably go with a fast comparator to implement the variable threshold input.
Properly applied, a fast comparator will have lower jitter than the rest
of the errors, and is an excellent choice. Bruce suggested the LTC6752,
which is a great part if you need high toggle speeds (100s of MHz) or
ultra-fast edges. But you don't need high toggle rates and may not need
ultra-fast edges. Repeatability and stability are more important than
raw speed in this application. The LT1719, LT1720, or TLV3501 may work
just as well for your purpose, and they are significantly less fussy to
Note that the LTC6752 series is an improved replacement for the ADCMP60x
series, which itself is an improved replacement for the MAX999. Of
these three, the LTC6752 is the clear winner in my tests. If you do
choose it (or similar), make sure you look at the transitions with
something that will honestly show you any chatter at frequencies up to
at least several GHz. It only takes a little transition chatter to
knock the potential timing resolution of the ultra-fast comparator way
down. Do make sure to test it with the slowest input edges you need it
More information about the time-nuts