[time-nuts] True Position GPSDP + Rb X72

Stephan Flor spflor at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 20 16:18:41 EDT 2017

Thank you Mark. I'm just starting to learn about Rb oscillators and GPSDO.  I started on this while repairing my old HP 8660c signal generator, and I wanted to get all of my equipment on a common sync clock. I bought the X72, because it was small, thinking I may be able to replace the ocxo in the 8660c with it.   Now I regret wasting $100 on the X72. I will download Lady Heather and see what I can do with it, while I wait for my True Position to arrive. Thank you,Steve 

    On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:18 AM, Mark Sims <holrum at hotmail.com> wrote:

 GPS disciplined rubidium oscillators are generally not a good idea.  Rubidiums tend to be quite a bit more noisy than OCXOs.  Their advantage is their long term frequency stability.  The GPS system in a GPSDO compensates for the OCXO drift,  so the only advantage of a GPS disciplined Rb is if you lose the GPS signal for a long time.

Also, remember Mark's Law of Rubidium Oscillators...  the small the oscillator, the crappier it is.  The X72 is a very small Rb oscillator and , guess what,  it's rather crappy.  Noisy,  temperature sensitive,  not all that good frequency stability.  A decent OCXO can out-perform it.

Lady Heather now supports the X72 (and SA22.c).  It has a disciplining routine that can lock it to a 1PPS input.  It uses the X72's built in time interval counter that has a 16.667 ns resolution (due to noise and synchronizing issues more like 33 ns).

Later firmware versions of the X72 and SA22.c have a built in 1PPS disciplining routine,  but I am not too impressed with it.  It seems rather temperamental (or just plain mental) and I have seen it go off into la-la land and refuse to lock.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


More information about the time-nuts mailing list