[time-nuts] New OCXO claims ppb performance.
kb8tq at n1k.org
Fri Jan 26 10:42:38 EST 2018
The “ppb” number in this case is the temperature performance. Indeed, that is “pretty close” to
the temperature performance of the CSAC. Aging is rated at 50 ppb / year. That’s a bit further
out than what a typical CSAC will do.
In either case, if you let the beast run for a year, it is aging that will dominate the error. Temperature
and voltage affects will be minor on either the CSAC or this OCXO *if* it runs “open loop” for a long
time. On the other hand, if it “phones home” for a sync on a daily basis, aging does not matter much
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 6:29 AM, Blair Lade <blairl at bettanet.net.au> wrote:
> Have just seen this and is relevant to the current CSAC discussion
> Blair lade (Australia)
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts