[volt-nuts] AC Voltage Measurement Standards

acbern at gmx.de acbern at gmx.de
Thu Jul 10 19:13:44 EDT 2014


in a nutshell, what i am doing is that I first establish the dc (+/-) output of the ref. TVC at nominal and then determine the ac voltage from a precision, highly linear (datron 4808) ac source that generates that default output voltage at the key frequencies. that establishes a set of ac voltage settings. for these the deviations of the TVC are known from the calibration. then I do the same with the TVC to be calibrated. (factor of 2 nom. voltage is important to stay within allowable range). that way you can link both.
sure, sending all to cal is more precise, if you get the right lab at least, but also very expensive.

would sure be interested in your tech paper



> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2014 um 13:27 Uhr
> Von: "Stephen Grady" <grady.steve at gmail.com>
> An: "'Discussion of precise voltage measurement'" <volt-nuts at febo.com>
> Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] AC Voltage Measurement Standards
>
> Todd and anyone else would is interested,
> 
> Measuring a Thermal Converter against another Thermal Converter is a bit of
> a black art. The main problem is thermal converters are a square law device
> that is if you change the input voltage by a factor of 2 the output voltage
> will change by a factor of approximately 4. Now I say approximately because
> for most thermal converters like the Fluke 540B, A55, Ballantine and Holts
> the actual factor can be anywhere from 1.4 to 1.8 due to losses in the
> thermal converter. In the literature you often see this factor refer to as
> the N factors. Each thermal converter will have its own N factor which must
> be measured to make sense of the measurements.
> 
> It even becomes more difficult in that the AC-DC difference of a thermal
> converter is defined as (Vac-Vdc)/Vdc where Vac and Vdc are the inputs to a
> thermal converter which give an equal output from the converter. Also Vdc is
> the mean of the forward and reverse DC voltages. The problem is that when
> you have two converters connected in parallel you cannot balance both
> converters AC and DC inputs to produce equal voltage out of the converters
> at the same time because each converter has its own AC-DC difference and its
> own N factor.
> 
> It anyone is interested I can send them a technical paper that describes
> this process and the appropriate math to use but I cannot send it to the
> list due to copyright issues.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Stephen Grady
> Sydney Australia
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: volt-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:volt-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Todd Micallef
> Sent: Thursday, 10 July 2014 2:36 AM
> To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement
> Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] AC Voltage Measurement Standards
> 
> I would like to know more about your setup. Which source(s) are you using
> for the input and which nanovoltmeter(s) are you using to transfer the 10V
> TVC to your other converters? I remember you asking on PMEL forum about the
> accuracy of using a 34420A nanovoltmeter. I did not see a response as to
> whether you opted for an alternative like Keithley 2182(A) or a low noise
> preamplifier connected to a 3458A.
> 
> I have done some reading about how NIST transfers their calibrations using
> two TVC's in parallel and I am guessing that is what you are doing.
> 
> http://www.nist.gov/pml/div684/acdc/tcs.cfm
> 
> To transfer the accuracy up/down to other TVC's at different rated voltages
> appears to be a difficult task since they typically need at least half the
> rated max voltage to be within spec. It would be similar to starting with a
> SR104 standard and transferring its value through a set of SR1010 and
> SR1050 resistors using an ESI 242.
> 
> I have a few AC sources, and I would like to be able to verify my TVC's
> without sending all of them out for cal. Ballantine quoted $600+ per TVC and
> I haven't checked what Fluke would charge for each A55.
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
> I personally did the following: I got a Ballantine 1605A transfer
> > voltmeter. This is comparable to the 792A in a way, except it was much 
> > cheaper. It is automatic, much easier to use than the Fluke 540 and 
> > goes up to I think 100MHz. This can be used for percision calibrations 
> > as a working standard. The calibration of this meter as well as others 
> > (e.g. the 3458A in its AC mode) I am doing with a set of thermal
> converters (0.5V to 100V).
> > One of which (10V) has been externally calibrated up to 30MHz, cal of 
> > the others are derived from it. That way I am deriving everything from 
> > a very precisely (few ppm) calibrated 10V TVC. Overall, this saves 
> > cost on the calibration side, allows for high accuracy and measurement
> speed is good.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> 
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> 


More information about the volt-nuts mailing list