[time-nuts] FMT

John Ackermann N8UR jra at febo.com
Thu Dec 28 19:13:23 EST 2006


Bill Tracey said the following on 12/28/2006 06:41 PM:

> I too got a  >1hz high error on W1AW on 40.  As I recall, the data had a 
> double peak in it - think I picked the stronger peak which apparently was 
> the wrong one.  Apparently the propagation on 40 was interesting when the 
> test was run.

I have to admit that I screwed up royally this year and had a math error
that threw all my results off by 70 to 100 Hz (stupid error -- getting
my sideband math backwards).  I'll get my results up on the web site
soon, both "as submitted" and what they would have been with the correct
math.

But I wanted to mention that I also saw a double hump on 40M, with about
0.5 Hz separation.  I wonder if it was an artifact of the transmitter,
or one of propagation.  As I understand it, the League this year used
regular ham transceivers instead of the old Harris rigs.  On 160 and 80
they had Ten-Tecs, and on 40 I think an Icom.

John



More information about the time-nuts mailing list