[time-nuts] FMT
John Ackermann N8UR
jra at febo.com
Thu Dec 28 19:13:23 EST 2006
Bill Tracey said the following on 12/28/2006 06:41 PM:
> I too got a >1hz high error on W1AW on 40. As I recall, the data had a
> double peak in it - think I picked the stronger peak which apparently was
> the wrong one. Apparently the propagation on 40 was interesting when the
> test was run.
I have to admit that I screwed up royally this year and had a math error
that threw all my results off by 70 to 100 Hz (stupid error -- getting
my sideband math backwards). I'll get my results up on the web site
soon, both "as submitted" and what they would have been with the correct
math.
But I wanted to mention that I also saw a double hump on 40M, with about
0.5 Hz separation. I wonder if it was an artifact of the transmitter,
or one of propagation. As I understand it, the League this year used
regular ham transceivers instead of the old Harris rigs. On 160 and 80
they had Ten-Tecs, and on 40 I think an Icom.
John
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list