[time-nuts] from Sputnik to CD
Thomas A. Frank
ka2cdk at cox.net
Sat Oct 6 19:17:19 EDT 2007
> If the sample rate is 44.1 kHz then the adev below 1 s, even
> down to 10 us, or jitter, or the phase noise above 1 kHz are
> they key parameters; not long-term drift. In this case I'd take
> a nice 10811A over a typical Rb any day. Does anyone know
> for sure, or am I off base here?
I think you've hit the nail on the head here. Jitter is most likely
the key parameter; a little bit of drift probably would not be noticed.
I wonder if the real problem is not the noise that would be generated
by jitter, but phase errors between channels? The ear is quite good at
determining the phase of arriving signals; if, during playback the
timing jumped between the decoding of the left and right channel some
interesting artifacts might appear, and they would not be -90dB, they
would be at the level of the playback signal being an actual error in
I will say that I wish the 'record' companies would put a little more
effort into the accuracy of their clocks. I've come across CD's that
were obviously recorded with a control clock that was in error, since
on playback the actual sound was 'slow' (and yes, I tried it on several
players to make sure it was really the CD).
But no one has commented on the song...
More information about the time-nuts