[time-nuts] 5 MHZ PIC PPS Divider?
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Sat Apr 12 18:25:08 EDT 2008
Bruce Griffiths wrote:
> John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>> Thanks, Bruce. I considered the idea of a multiplier but would like to
>> use a software-only solution if I can. That's not only for simplicity,
>> but also to eliminate additional sources of jitter; the experiment I
>> have in mind is to test the second-to-second noise (and short term noise
>> trends) of GPS and other PPS sources,* so I'm looking for as stable a
>> reference as I can get. The additional noise from a mulitplier may be
>> small, but I want to minimize the number of unknowns.
>> * I realize that I'll also be limited by counter resolution.
> If minimising the PPS jitter, is important adding a single D flipflop to
> resynchronise the output PPS signal to the 5MHz input will be worthwhile.
> A relatively complex chip like a PIC is likely to produce a PPS output
> signal with a jitter much greater than that produced by a single flipflop.
> Measuring the PPS output jitter of the PIC will be somewhat challenging
> as It I would expect it to be somewhat less than 100ps.
> The corresponding output jitter at the resynchronising flipflop output
> should be significantly less than 10ps even for a 74HC74.
> In this case only the flipflop's random jitter is significant as the
> frequency and duty cycle of the PPS input to the flipflop are constant
> apart from the effects of jitter.
It is also possible to use a frequency doubler to generate 10MHz from
the 5MHz input to drive the PIC and resynchronise the resultant PPS
output from the PIC to the 5MHz input using an external D flipflop.
This will remove the jitter due to both the frequency divider and the PIC.
Using a low phase shift filter (ie none ) at the doubler output will
ensure a relatively stable delay between the 5MHz zero crossing and the
10MHz doubler output.
More information about the time-nuts