[time-nuts] Agilent 53148A, thunderbolt and my 10 Ghz LO

John Miles jmiles at pop.net
Fri Dec 19 22:53:01 UTC 2008


Well, sure, it's more accurate than the undisciplined OCXO in the counter,
that's the idea behind the Thunderbolt. :)

-- john, KE5FX

> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com]On
> Behalf Of n3izn at aol.com
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 12:07 PM
> To: time-nuts at febo.com
> Subject: [time-nuts] Agilent 53148A, thunderbolt and my 10 Ghz LO
>
>
> I'm borrowing a power meter and frequency county from work, an
> Agilent 53148A. While it's slow at work I wanted to make some
> measurements and align my ham radio stuff.
>
> It's last calibration was in May 08. I let it warm up for several
> hours, and it has the oven option.
>
> My 10 Ghz LO is 10,224 Mhz and it was 70 hz off. Not a big deal
> for my application.
>
> I found the manual and figured out how to choose an external
> reference on the 53148. I just wanted to ask the group if the
> Thunderbolt would be more accurate than the internal reference? I
> want to think it is but my link to the thunderbolt spec sheet is
> no longer valid.
>
> This weekend I'll measure it again using the tBolt as a reference.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>




More information about the time-nuts mailing list