[time-nuts] Low jitter oscillators
lists at rtty.us
Mon Aug 16 11:20:00 UTC 2010
You also have a lot of devices being characterized in terms of "added
jitter" doing exactly the same sort of stuff.
From: <SAIDJACK at aol.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 11:31 PM
To: <time-nuts at febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low jitter oscillators
> Hi Bob,
> Agreed that at a minimum the instrument will restrict the bandwidth due
> it's own bandwidth limitations, and some (like the Wavecrest units) go up
> to 1GHz or more.
> But many vendors claim sub 1ps jitter on low cost oscillators, and don't
> specify what bandwidth was used to measure this jitter. That would be like
> giving phase noise in dBc without also specifying the /Hz, and then every
> vendor using their own internal bandwidth definitions to make their phase
> noise claims..
> Sometimes I think vendors assume that E5052A units are being used
> everywhere to measure jitter.
> In a message dated 8/15/2010 17:34:09 Pacific Daylight Time, lists at rtty.us
> The bandwidths chosen generally have roots in a telcom spec. Infinite
> bandwidth generally equates to infinite jitter. You have to restrict it
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts